Krotov D.S.
Potapov V.N.
Sobolev Institute of Mathematics, Novosibirsk
Sobolev Institute of Mathematics, Novosibirsk
Let be an arbitrary natural number,
be a finite
2
set of cardinality
, and
. Let
be a mapping from
to
.
If
holds
for every
that differ in exactly one coordinate
then the triple
is called partial
-quasigroup
(of order
).
If in addition
then the pair
is called
-quasigroup (of order
).
It is naturally to think of a -quasigroup
as a value array of
. In such
-dimensional array of size
every row (column)
of every direction contains all elements of
(see, for example, Figure 2).
Two -quasigroups
and
are called equivalent
if there exist permutations
and
such that
.
The -quasigroup
is called extension
of the partial
-quasigroup
if
.
Note that a partial
-quasigroup may have more than one extension,
as well as it may have no extensions at all.
There are exactly two -quasigroups of order
. All
-quasigroups of order
are equivalent, and their number is
. The order
is the first
nontrivial from the view-point of variability case.
Let
and
be the number of different
-quasigroups
.
It was shown in [1] that
The upper estimations (2)-(6) on are based on the number
of extensions of special-purpose partial
-quasigroups.
The mapping is uniquely defined by two subfunctions
and
.
The pairs
and
are
-quasigroups.
Therefore Lemma 2 implies
For -ary mapping
we call
-ary minorant the mapping
obtained by the substituting zeros for some
arguments of
.
Lemma 3 implies that
-ary minorant of
can be reconstructed from
-ary minorants by at most four ways,
provided
is a
-quasigroup and
.
Let
, where
(see, f.i., Fig.1d).
Let
be
-quasigroup.
The partial
-quasigroup
,
where
,
specifies all the
-ary
minorants of
. The number of minorants is
, of which
are
- and
-ary. Therefore, assuming
is specified,
the number of ways for
to be reconstructed is at most
.
The number of ways to specify
is
, therefore
Let the mapping
be defined by the value table
Call the -quasigroup
bicubical
if it is equivalent to
the
-quasigroup
with
.
Call -quasigroup
cubical
if it is equivalent to some
-quasigroup
such that
.
Figure 2 gives
examples of bicubical, cubical, and non-cubical
-quasigroups.
![]() |
Lemma 4 allows to strengthen the previous bound:
Let be the set of all decomposed
-quasigroups
, and
be the set of
-quasigroups
which are not
cubical.
By the inequality (5) there is no difficulty in proving that
The folowing statement is established by the total computer
enumeration of -quasigroups or order
.
Let ,
and
are defined as in Section 2.
Therefore,
.
Moreover, since
for every
, it is true that
, and
if
. Taking Proposition 3 as a base, it's now easy to prove
by induction that
provided
.
Since
by Proposition 1, it holds
![]() |
![]() [Home] [Conference] |
©2001, Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Science, Novosibirsk
©2001, United Institute of Computer Science SB RAS, Novosibirsk
©2001, Institute of Computational Techologies SB RAS, Novosibirsk
©2001, A.P. Ershov Institute of Informatics Systems SB RAS, Novosibirsk
©2001, Institute of Mathematics SB RAS, Novosibirsk
©2001, Institute of Cytology and Genetics SB RAS, Novosibirsk
©2001, Institute of Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Geophysics SB RAS, Novosibirsk
©2001, Novosibirsk State University
Last modified Saturday, 06-Oct-2001 18:20:30 NOVST